This week we participated in the process of photogrammetry, embodying an active modeler. Simply viewing an object in an exhibition and attempting to model an object are two different experiences with different purposes and outcomes. In an exhibition, you are an observer, the object in its actual form, and you can appreciate its aesthetic qualities. When you attempt to model an object, you are engaging in the process of creating a representation of the object. The modeling process requires active engagement as you decide the object’s shape, size, and texture.
The process of photogrammetry encourages close looking and attention to details that you might otherwise have ignored. During the photoshoot of the object, you take multiple pictures from many different angles that allow the individual to see small details. Another example is that editing opens new perspectives and insights once the model is made. Lastly, the actual 3D Model allows a 360 view, which wouldn’t be possible at a museum.
Photogrammetry definitely sparks an interest in a particular object. The process creates opportunities to see many details, bringing up many insightful questions about the model. Our particular model was a man riding a horse. I was very curious about how it was made, how long it took, and the story behind it. The process has allowed me to appreciate the artisan’s work. Especially given the time period the piece was made, it truly fascinated me.
Moving from passive observer to active modeler has changed how art and history should be communicated to various public. We can communicate how advanced civilization might be by allowing a 360 perspective of the model allowing people to gain new information and understandings. Also becoming an active modeler was also about experiencing the process (for example, taking over 90 photos and paying attention to all types of details), which is very important to communicate about art and history. 3D models allow people an experience rather than view an object in a glass.
